首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison of Computational Aeroacoustic Prediction Methods for Transonic Rotor Noise
【2h】

A Comparison of Computational Aeroacoustic Prediction Methods for Transonic Rotor Noise

机译:跨音速转子噪声的计算航空声预测方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper compares two methods for predicting transonic rotor noise for helicopters in hover and forward flight. Both methods rely on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution as input to predict the acoustic near and far fields. For this work, the same full-potential rotor code has been used to compute the CFD solution for both acoustic methods. The first method employs the acoustic analogy as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, including the quadrupole term. The second method uses a rotating Kirchhoff formulation. Computed results from both methods are compared with one other and with experimental data for both hover and advancing rotor cases. The results are quite good for all cases tested. The sensitivity of both methods to CFD grid resolution and to the choice of the integration surface/volume is investigated. The computational requirements of both methods are comparable; in both cases these requirements are much less than the requirements for the CFD solution.
机译:本文比较了两种预测悬停和向前飞行的直升机的跨音速转子噪声的方法。两种方法都依赖于计算流体动力学(CFD)解决方案作为输入来预测近场和远场的声场。对于这项工作,使用相同的全电势转子代码来为两种声学方法计算CFD解决方案。第一种方法采用Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings(FW-H)方程(包括四极子项)中体现的声学类比。第二种方法使用旋转基尔霍夫公式。将两种方法的计算结果相互比较,并与悬停和前进转子情况的实验数据进行比较。对于所有测试的情况,结果都非常好。研究了这两种方法对CFD网格分辨率和对积分面/体积的选择的敏感性。两种方法的计算要求是可比较的;在这两种情况下,这些要求都远远低于CFD解决方案的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号